The group's notice on the evaluation of management personnel and administrative personnel above the team leader in 2009

In order to seek truth from facts to reflect the quality of work of each manager and administrative personnel in 2009, and to fairly and fairly evaluate the good job award and whether the post is adjusted, left or not, the group requires a level-to-level, in accordance with the group's "2008 Administrative and Managerial Personnel". In "Description of Staff Award Evaluation" [2009006], the basis for evaluating work awards is content. details as follows:

1. The person in charge of the assessment:

1. Person in charge: general manager of the group, general manager of each branch, and person in charge of each line.

2. The specific person in charge:

① Group personnel, general managers of branches, and heads of various lines are in charge of the assistant general manager of the group.

② Each branch is in charge of the director of the branch office.

③ Each line is in charge of the line person in charge.

3. Members: Office personnel, financial personnel, and department heads participate or assist.

2. Evaluation content:

Based on the basis for assessing worker awards in "2008 Explanation of the 2008 Administrative and Managerial Staff Award Evaluation" [2009006], the whole year is sorted and summarized item by item. For details, please refer to the attached evaluation form.

3. Evaluation description:

1. Evaluate each manager and administrative staff. The year-end work award evaluation and whether the post should be adjusted or left or not will be discussed and determined based on the evaluation results.

2. The specific content of the evaluation of each person must be based on the actual position of the post, and it must truly and comprehensively reflect the work situation of the person throughout the year. The quantitative data must be compared with that of 2008, and there are objective reasons to indicate the situation. Additional paper is attached.

3. Evaluation method: ① Quantitative data is calculated according to the annual and monthly data. ②Errors and praise and rewards are calculated according to the usual records throughout the year (including branch and group inspections). ③Other content shall be comprehensively discussed and assessed by the assessors on the basis of the personal year-end summary and the public opinion assessment of the relevant personnel in the position (with the public opinion assessment form attached).

 

Zhejiang Xingfa Chemical Fiber Group Co., Ltd.